Skip to main content
· 5/24/1995

Lathan Dennis v. County of Fairfax

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 151
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12603
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,631
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1681
  • 1995 WL 325231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claims barred which “exceed the scope of the EEOC charge and any charges that would naturally have arisen from an investigation thereof.”
  • finding claims which “exceed the scope of the EEOC charge and any charges that would naturally have arisen from an investigation thereof” are barred
  • hiring, promotion, and training discrimination claims dismissed where EEOC charge alleged only discriminatory discipline
  • “The central characteristic of a consent decree is that it does not involve contest or decision on the merits.” (cleaned up)
  • “[W]here an employer implements timely and adequate corrective measutes after harassing conduct has come to its 49 attention, vicarious liability should be barred regardless of the specific motivation for the wrongdoing or the particular cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Wilkinson, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.