Skip to main content
· 4/17/1890

Latham v. City of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 83 Cal. 564
  • 23 P. 1116
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, under a similar Georgia exemption statute, the trustee bore the burden to show that “the payments were not intended to substitute for wages”
  • finding that an annuity provided income as a substitute for wages where the annuity gave the debtor the immediate right to payments and the debtor testified that “she purchased the annuity to replace her income given her age at the time of purchase, 65, and to support her in her retirement”
  • applying the Rousey “on account of age” standard to a similar state exemption statute, and noting that “nothing in [the state exemption statute] indicates an intent to limit application of the exemption to annuities purchased before the payee attains a certain age”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.