Skip to main content
· 12/16/1974

Lataille v. District Court of Eastern Hampden

Citations

  • 320 N.E.2d 877
  • 366 Mass. 525
  • 1974 Mass. LEXIS 749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing “substantive legal arguments underlying the petition [which] are the same whether the writ [is] considered one in certiorari, mandamus or invocation of supervisory powers”
  • difference between evidentiary standard for prehminary hearing on complaint and probable cause standard applicable to indictments
  • complaint and indictment “are alternative means for establishing probable cause to hold a defendant for trial”
  • grand jury serve \dual function of determining whether there is probable cause to believe a crime 12 has been committed and of protecting citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions\
  • “indictment is itself a determination of probable cause and renders” hearing “unnecessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Quirico, Hennessey, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.