· 12/16/1974
Lataille v. District Court of Eastern Hampden
Citations
- 320 N.E.2d 877
- 366 Mass. 525
- 1974 Mass. LEXIS 749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing “substantive legal arguments underlying the petition [which] are the same whether the writ [is] considered one in certiorari, mandamus or invocation of supervisory powers”
- difference between evidentiary standard for prehminary hearing on complaint and probable cause standard applicable to indictments
- complaint and indictment “are alternative means for establishing probable cause to hold a defendant for trial”
- grand jury serve \dual function of determining whether there is probable cause to believe a crime 12 has been committed and of protecting citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions\
- “indictment is itself a determination of probable cause and renders” hearing “unnecessary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro, Quirico, Hennessey, Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.