Laster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Attorney General’s adoption of I.A.D. forms was in the Maryland Extradition Manual
• the question is whether “the IAD proceeding ... was pursuant to a prisoner demand for disposition or [the receiving state’s] request for temporary custody”
• “Clearly, the prospect of multiple trials in the receiving state would establish good cause for a continuance” beyond the IAD time limits
• “Upon receipt of Forms 2, 3 and 4, the prosecutor completes Form 7[,] . . . in which the prosecutor certifies that the prisoner will be brought to trial within the time specified in Article III, and sends it to the warden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stone v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-26· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-30· cited 10×
• State v. Widmer-Baum
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-11-14· cited 5×
• State v. Coale
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-03-31· cited 4×
• Burton v. Mumford, Warden
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-08· cited 2×
• State v. Meadows
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-04-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Mauro
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
• Boyd v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-05· cited 18×
• Boyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-27· cited 18×