· 7/17/2006
Laster v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 439 F. Supp. 2d 93
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47980
- 2006 WL 1982291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that if the stay-put provision applies, “injunctive relief is available without the traditional showing of irreparable harm”
- collecting cases and noting “courts have consistently interpreted the stay-put provision to be an automatic injunction.”
- “Because a preliminary injunction may be unlimited in duration, notice to adverse parties is required.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.