Lassiter v. Harry P. Leu, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements that sales reductions were temporary and full-year sales projections would be met were non-actionable predictions of the future
• holding that “alleged statement that the ‘current financial posture justified the projections for future sales’ is not actionable because it was an expression of opinion that the projections were adequately supported”
• stating that “expressions of opinion” cannot “give rise to actionable common law fraud”
• observing the “carefully negotiated disclaimer language” crafted by “highly sophisticated parties, assisted by industry consultants and experienced legal counsel”
• observing the “carefully negotiated disclaimer language” crafted by “highly sophisticated parties, assisted by industry consultants and experienced legal counsel”
• observing the “carefully negotiated disclaimer language” crafted by “highly sophisticated parties, assisted by industry consultants and experienced legal counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).