· 1/13/2014
Lassiter v. City of Phila.
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 902
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 777
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3404
- 571 U.S. 1126
- 2014 WL 102422
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that physical incapacitation and delay resulting from the actions of prison staff as possible bases for good cause
- holding that, where a prisoner was unable to exhaust his administrative remedies because of something not within his control, the exhaustion defense was unavailable
- noting that it was defendants’ burden to prove their affirmative defense and to show that they were entitled to summary judgment on that basis
- stating that “evidence that the prisoner … was not diligent … would preclude a finding of exhaustion”
- On summary judgment, the magistrate’s cred- ibility and factual determinations regarding exhaustion of the grievance procedures were inappropriate.
- “[A] prisoner must comply with the specific procedures and deadlines established by the prison’s policy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.