Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Lassiter v. City of Phila.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 902
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 777
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3404
  • 571 U.S. 1126
  • 2014 WL 102422
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that physical incapacitation and delay resulting from the actions of prison staff as possible bases for good cause
  • holding that, where a prisoner was unable to exhaust his administrative remedies because of something not within his control, the exhaustion defense was unavailable
  • noting that it was defendants’ burden to prove their affirmative defense and to show that they were entitled to summary judgment on that basis
  • stating that “evidence that the prisoner … was not diligent … would preclude a finding of exhaustion”
  • On summary judgment, the magistrate’s cred- ibility and factual determinations regarding exhaustion of the grievance procedures were inappropriate.
  • “[A] prisoner must comply with the specific procedures and deadlines established by the prison’s policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.