Skip to main content
· 7/2/1926

Lassell v. City of Gloversville

Citations

  • 217 A.D. 323
  • 217 N.Y.S. 128
  • 1926 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that California rule, “modeled almost word for word on rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” does not allow a pro se attorney litigant to recover sanctions in the form of an award of attorney’s fees
  • “[T]he phrase ‘expenses incurred’ contemplates an obligation that a party has become liable to pay. [The rule] does not provide for compensation for time lost from other employment.”
  • “[T]he phrase ‘expenses incurred’ contemplates an obligation that a party has become liable to pay. [The rule] does not provide for compensation for time lost from other employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kellogg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.