Skip to main content
· 4/22/2004

Lasprilla v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 98
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7983
  • 2004 WL 858740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the BIA need not even “explain its reasons when deciding a motion to reconsider”
  • indicating that alien could present evidence in removal proceedings that previously denied visa petition was meritorious in fact
  • indicating that alien could present evidence in removal proceedings that previously denied visa petition was meritorious in fact
  • stating that a motion to reconsider was properly denied when petitioner failed to show that he qualified for adjustment of status under the 'grandfathering' provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Gibson, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.