Skip to main content
· 4/8/1958

Laslo v. Griffith

Citations

  • 102 S.E.2d 894
  • 143 W. Va. 469
  • 1958 W. Va. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When the facts relied upon to establish the existence of an agency are undisputed, and conflicting inferences can not be drawn from such facts, the question of the existence of the agency is one of law for the eourt[.]”
  • “When the facts relied upon to establish the existence of an agency are undisputed, and conflicting inferences can not be drawn from such facts, the question of the existence of the agency is one of law for the court[.]”
  • “When the facts relied upon to establish the existence of an agency are undisputed, and conflicting inferences can not be drawn from such facts, the question of the existence of the agency is one of law for the court[.]”; Cremeans v. Maynard, 162 W. Va. 74, 86, 246 S.E.2d 253, 259 (1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haymond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.