· 9/27/1916
Lasley v. Depp
Citations
- 171 Ky. 218
- 188 S.W. 352
- 1916 Ky. LEXIS 330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[m]erely contending that [one] has no recollection of receiving information is insufficient to oppose evidence to the contrary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Settle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.