Skip to main content
· 9/27/1916

Lasley v. Depp

Citations

  • 171 Ky. 218
  • 188 S.W. 352
  • 1916 Ky. LEXIS 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[m]erely contending that [one] has no recollection of receiving information is insufficient to oppose evidence to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.