Lasky v. City of Bad Axe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that these provisions “are enacted for the benefit of property holders and taxpayers, and not for the benefit of or enrichment of bidders”
• “[O]ne making a bid or entering into a contract with a municipality, acts at his peril; he is supposed to know the law.”
• “[O]ne making a bid or entering into a contract with a municipality, acts at his peril; he is 5 supposed to know the law.”
• contract changing welded joints to screw joints and substituting cement blocks for bricks found to be substantial changes but inclusion of a liquidation clause and changes in completion timeframes were not considered substantial
• statutes requiring competitive bidding, and that contracts be awarded to the lowest capable bidder, “are enacted for the benefit of property holders and taxpayers, and not for the benefit of or enrichment of bidders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).