Mississippi Supreme Court· 3/18/1987
Laskosky v. Laskosky
Citations
- 504 So. 2d 726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the principle of comity is similar to full faith and credit except that it is not governed by Federal statutes and that its application rests in the discretion of the trial judge\
- \the principle of comity is similar to full faith and credit except that it is not governed by Federal statutes and that its application rests in the discretion of the trial judge\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, P.J., and Dan M. Lee and Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Church v. MasseyMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 61×
- Jundoosing v. JundoosingMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-09-12· cited 44×
- Adoption of D.N.T. v. R.D.H.Mississippi Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 33×
- Curtis v. CurtisMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-27· cited 24×
- Department of Human Services v. ShelnutMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 23×
- Greater Canton Ford Mercury, Inc. v. AblesMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-02-01· cited 23×
- Till Derr v. Thomas SwarekFifth Circuit· 2014-09-09· cited 21×
- O'ROURKE v. Colonial Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 20×
- Roberts v. FuhrMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-11-12· cited 15×
- Cooley v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 12×
- Patton v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-12-13· cited 7×
- Asanov v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-11-08· cited 5×
- John K. Hamilton v. Kidron S. Wise YoungMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 5×
- Castleberry v. CastleberryMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-03-15· cited 4×
- Carr v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1998-12-18· cited 1×
- Gary W Church v. William R. MasseyMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-10-05
- Mississippi Department of Human Services v. Edward E. ShelnutMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-08-02
- Esworlallsing Jundoosing v. Sheila JundoosingMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-08-22
- Greater Canton Ford Mercury, Inc. v. Wallace AblesMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-07-18
- In Re Adoption of DNTMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-04-24
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 177×
- Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-05-22· cited 146×
- Kountouris v. VarvarisMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-09-25· cited 41×
- Owens, by and Through, Mosley v. HuffmanMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-13· cited 34×
- McDonald v. McDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-03-03· cited 34×
- Covington v. CovingtonMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 32×
- Bergstrom Ex Rel. Bergstrom v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-10-16· cited 32×
- Brown v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-08-27· cited 31×
- Administrators of the Tulane Ed. Fund v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 30×
- Mixon v. BullardMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-12-16· cited 29×
- Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court· 1959-01-19· cited 19×
- Seaney v. SeaneyMississippi Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 18×
- Bynum v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-01-10· cited 14×
- Al-Fassi v. Al-FassiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-28· cited 14×
- Hill v. HillMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-13· cited 11×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-08-29· cited 11×
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-05-02· cited 6×
- Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.