Laska v. Anoka County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that woman who promised to “help” her mother run a day care owed all the children in the day care a duty based on special relationship
• \Because [a daycare helper] voluntarily accepted the custody and control of a group of vulnerable individuals [children] ... we conclude that [she] did have a special relationship with [the child decedent].\
• “Because [a daycare helper] voluntarily accepted the custody and control of a group of vulnerable individuals [children] . . . we conclude that [she] did have a special relationship with [the child decedent].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).