Lasher v. State
Citations
- 80 Fla. 712
- 86 So. 689
Syllabus
<p>1. A “Ford touring car” is a sufficient description of the article alleged to have been stolen, to bring tbe offense within the provisions of Section 3288, General Statutes of 1906.</p> <p>2. Where an information contains more than one count and only the last count concludes with the words “contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida,” such conclusion reaches back to each count, and it is not necessary that each count should so conclude.</p> <p>.3. No single count in an indictment containing more than one is the indictment. The indictment is the thing which contains all the counts, and where it concludes with the words “contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida” the conclusion belongs to the entire indictment and applies to each count.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 18×
- Farrior v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-11-16· cited 14×
- Horner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-12· cited 14×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-01-31· cited 7×
- Pegues v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-14· cited 5×
- Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-10-06· cited 4×
- Hidalgo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-04-02
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.