Lash v. Hollis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s exclusion of proposed expert who had no experience with Tasers, Taser injuries, or the specific Taser at issue in the case
• noting that a critical factor for evaluating the reasonableness of fees “is the magnitude of the plaintiff’s success in the case as a whole” (quoting Jenkins v. Missouri, 127 F.3d 709, 716 (8th Cir. 1997)); cf. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 435 (1983
• “[A] plaintiff’s success in a civil rights case can be measured only in part by monetary success…. Lawsuits like the present case provide a forum for exposing official misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).