Laser v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “independent examinations of claimants are not required,” although they are “common in ERISA cases”
• criticizing plan administrator for failing to relate plaintiffs reported maladies to his job where policy defined disability in relation to claimant’s ability to perform his job

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).