Lasecki v. Lasecki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court may impute income to a party only upon finding that the party has deliberately depressed his income or deliberately acted in disregard of his obligation to provide support[.]” (Citation and quotation marks omitted)
• \The trial court may impute income to a party only upon finding that the party has deliberately depressed his income or deliberately acted in disregard of his obligation to provide support[.]\ (Citation and quotation marks omitted)
• \The trial court may impute income to a party only upon finding that the party has deliberately depressed his income or deliberately acted in disregard of his obligation to provide support[.]\ (citation and quotation marks omitted and emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lasecki v. Lasecki
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-12-19· cited 10×
• County of Durham by and Through Durham DSS v. Burnette
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-16· cited 9×
• Crews v. Crews
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-05· cited 3×
• Walton v. Walton
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-12-18· cited 1×
• Madigan v. Madigan
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-05-01