Skip to main content
· 7/5/1983

Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bachanov

Citations

  • 436 So. 2d 236
  • 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the “liberality in granting leave to amend diminishes as the case progresses to trial”
  • holding that two prior complaints and the testimony from two witnesses who were injured by the same model meat grinder were admissible to rebut the notion that defendant had no notice of a defective condition of the grinder model at issue
  • remanding for new trial and amendment of the complaint when the plaintiffs were permitted \to amend their complaint to add a claim for punitive damages halfway through the trial\
  • “It is well settled that a trial court’s decision to permit or refuse amendment to pleadings will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Hubbart and Nesbitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.