LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Delice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although Knick eliminated the state-exhaustion requirement, “it did not alter the requirement for a final decision from the regulator before any litigation is commenced”
• “[I]t would have been futile for [plaintiff] to amend its complaint to add an additional unripe claim.”
• “As is proper when a dispute is not ripe, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice.”
• prudential ripeness requirement for regulatory takings remains good law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).