LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. C/HCA Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an offer of proof was not required because the trial court knew both the identity of the proposed witness and the subject matter of his proposed testimony
• holding that an offer of proof was not required because the trial court knew both the identity of the proposed witness and the subject matter of his proposed testimony
• finding that a jury instruction that deviated from committee directives did not prejudice defendants because the instruction was still an accurate statement of the applicable law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).