Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that documents “could be authenticated by their distinctive characteristics” under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(4), and reversing decision that documents “must be authenticated by a competent witness with personal knowledge of their authenticity”
• recognizing the potential of a defensive claim by the patron against the casino for failure to reduce the line of credit upon request
• noting that the Ninth Circuit will only reverse the district court if its ruling was prejudicial and would have warranted a different judgment
• stating that court must consider each party’s evidence submitted with cross‐motions for summary judgment regardless which motion evidence is attached to
• discussing 25 a casino’s obligations under a bilateral marker contract in Nevada
• discussing a casino’s obligations under a bilateral marker contract in Nevada

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).