larue/tucker v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one-year statute of limitations for defamation begins to run upon publication
• “republishing material in a new 24 edition, editing and republishing it, or placing it in a new form is a separate publication 25 giving rise to a separate cause of action”
• applying the “single publication rule” and noting that, “in the case of Internet publications, the statute of limitations begins to run when the allegedly defamatory material is first made available to the public by posting it on a website”
• when material is republished such that it is published in a new manner, this form of separate publication results in a separate cause of action
• “A plaintiff has one 12 year after a defamation action accrues to commence and prosecute his claim.”
• “Mere modifications to the way information is accessed, as 19 opposed to changes in the nature of the information itself, does not constitute 20 republication.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).