LaRue v. 1817 Lake Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury question was presented as to the plaintiff-passenger’s negligence when the plaintiff-passenger and the driver of the motorcycle had been drinking beer together before the accident
• noting that “comparative fault is a question of fact within the jury’s province, which should not lightly be invaded by the trial court”
• noting that “comparative fault is a question of fact within the jury’s province, which should not lightly be invaded by the trial court”
• noting that comparative fault is typically a jury issue
• “Tennessee courts have frequently held that comparative fault is a jury question unless the proof is so clear that reasonable minds could not disagree”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).