Larson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The criminal acts with which Larson was charged do not involve the exercise of these [First Amendment] rights, so this consideration is not pertinent.”
• “A statute which applies without question to a defendant’s activities will not be held void for vagueness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 180×
• State v. Erickson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-01-20· cited 169×
• Christie v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-06-09· cited 68×
• State v. Rice
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-04-10· cited 68×
• Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-11-02· cited 54×
• Keith v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-05-30· cited 52×
• Bonjour v. Bonjour
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-03-30· cited 52×
• Summers v. Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-01-26· cited 48×
• Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-11-22· cited 39×
• De Nardo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-10-25· cited 34×
• Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-10-28· cited 30×
• Carman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-11-30· cited 25×
• Crutchfield v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-11-07· cited 20×
• Schoonover v. Bonner County
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-11-24· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Hammond v. Allen
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-01-30· cited 10×
• McKenzie v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-06-25· cited 8×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-04-05· cited 7×
• O'DONNELL v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-08· cited 2×
• Haggblom v. City of Dillingham
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-08-29· cited 2×