Skip to main content
· 4/16/1993

Larson v. Ruskowitz

Citations

  • 850 P.2d 253
  • 252 Kan. 963
  • 1993 Kan. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “any protection to be afforded plaintiffs must come through their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech”
  • retaliatoiy discharge claim when a public employee is terminated for exercising First Amendment rights to free speech on an issue of public concern
  • statute inapplicable when board of county commissioners acts in an administrative capacity to approve an employee reorganization plan and declines later to modify that plan
  • retaliatory discharge claim when a public employee terminated for exercising First Amendment rights on an issue of public concern
  • statute inapplicable when board of county commissioners acts in an administrative capacity to approve an employee reorganization plan and declines later to modify that plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.