· 4/16/1993
Larson v. Ruskowitz
Citations
- 850 P.2d 253
- 252 Kan. 963
- 1993 Kan. LEXIS 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “any protection to be afforded plaintiffs must come through their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech”
- retaliatoiy discharge claim when a public employee is terminated for exercising First Amendment rights to free speech on an issue of public concern
- statute inapplicable when board of county commissioners acts in an administrative capacity to approve an employee reorganization plan and declines later to modify that plan
- retaliatory discharge claim when a public employee terminated for exercising First Amendment rights on an issue of public concern
- statute inapplicable when board of county commissioners acts in an administrative capacity to approve an employee reorganization plan and declines later to modify that plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.