Skip to main content
· 3/27/1998

Larson v. Park City Municipal Corp.

Citations

  • 955 P.2d 343
  • 339 Utah Adv. Rep. 17
  • 1998 Utah LEXIS 13
  • 1998 WL 159804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff's notice of claim was timely because it was filed with the correct body of government within one year
  • allowing claim where statute was unclear as to where notice was to be filed
  • upholding the validity of a notice sent to a city recorder where the then-controlling version of the Immunity Act failed to state \how or in what manner a notice of claim should be filed with [a] city council\
  • declining to reach the question of whether the savings statute could preserve an action filed under the Act where the plaintiff never commenced a valid action}; Standard Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Kirkbride, 821 P.2d 1136, 1138 (Utah 1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Zimmerman, Howe, Stewart, Durham, Russon'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.