Larson v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s finding of untimeliness where, among other things, the “attempt to intervene delayed a settlement”
• measuring the delay of an intervention motion from the grant of summary judgment against named plaintiffs representing a subclass to which the prospective intervenor belonged
• affirming the district court’s finding of untimeliness where, among other things, the intervenor “appeared] to have acted for strategic reasons”
• distinguishing McDonald where the proposed inter-venor's “goal in seeking to intervene was not to obtain class certification”
• upholding “refus[al] to allow belated intervention by a sophisticated litigant with a large stake who had no good excuse for failing to seek intervention (or bringing its own suit) years ago”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).