Larson v. Dumke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating we review a district court’s determination of Rule 23.1 standing for abuse of discretion
• holding \a single shareholder may bring a derivative suit\
• shareholder in closely held corporation who was “the only shareholder similarly situated” was an adequate representative under Rule 23.1
• “An adequate representative must . . . be free from economic interests that are antagonistic to the interests of the class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).