Federal Circuit· 6/5/2009
Larson v. Correct Craft, Inc.
Citations
- 569 F.3d 1319
- 91 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1342
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12072
- 2009 WL 1564473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “because being declared the sole inventor will not generate any other direct financial rewards” there was no concrete financial interest
- holding that a plaintiff who “affirmatively transferred title to the patents” lacked standing to pursue a correction of inventorship claim because he would financially “reap no benefit” from correction
- holding that “questions of patent owner- ship are determined by state law”
- dismissing case because Plaintiffs financial interests depended on his obtaining rescission of his patent assignments
- declining to address reputational interests when the plaintiff had claimed no reputational injury
- declining to address reputational interests when the plaintiff had claimed no reputational injury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gajarsa, Moore, Arterton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Federal Circuit· 2010-12-22· cited 60×
- HIF Bio, Inc. v. Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-31· cited 50×
- Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceS.D. Florida· 2013-07-16· cited 39×
- Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLCFederal Circuit· 2015-10-02· cited 25×
- Kamdem-Ouaffo v. PepsiCo, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-01-26· cited 22×
- Informatics Applications Group, Inc. v. ShkolnikovE.D. Virginia· 2011-12-27· cited 20×
- Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc.D. Colorado· 2010-01-21· cited 10×
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonD. Oregon· 2013-05-28· cited 10×
- Maryland Enterprise, L.L.C. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-02-15· cited 7×
- Bianco v. Globus Medical, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2014-03-06· cited 7×
- Speedfit LLC v. Woodway USA, Inc.E.D. New York· 2016-12-28· cited 7×
- Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLCFederal Circuit· 2011-03-14· cited 5×
- Trireme Medical, LLC v. Angioscore, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-02-05· cited 5×
- Krauser v. Evollution IP Holdings, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2013-09-20· cited 5×
- Pedersen v. GeschwindD. Maryland· 2015-10-27· cited 4×
- Nolen v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-02-01· cited 4×
- Nova Design Technologies, Ltd. v. WaltersE.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-06-28· cited 4×
- University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V.D. Massachusetts· 2012-06-11· cited 4×
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-05-24· cited 3×
- Eastwood v. Molecular Defenses Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2019-05-01· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 2,928×
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court· 1934-12-03· cited 590×
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Federal Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 245×
- Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corporation and Fiber Trim Sewing CompanyFederal Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 201×
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeFederal Circuit· 1997-09-02· cited 149×
- McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos CompanyFederal Circuit· 1989-05-12· cited 82×
- Joany Chou v. The University of Chicago and Arch Development Corporation, and Bernard Roizman, and Aviron CompanyFederal Circuit· 2001-07-03· cited 80×
- Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionFederal Circuit· 2008-12-18· cited 43×
- Jim Arnold Corp. v. Hydrotech Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1997-03-21· cited 16×
- Larson v. Correct Craft, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2008-02-01· cited 2×
Other cases named Larson v. Correct Craft, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.