Larson v. Bath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where the UM statute has a written rejection requirement, something less is ineffective despite clear evidence of the insured’s intent to reject the coverage.”
• although construing K.S.A. 40-284[c] was not necessary in view of the plain language of the statute that requires a written rejection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).