Larsen v. Carlene Langford & Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]o successfully raise the counter-defense of fraudulent inducement the buyer must present some summary judgment evidence”
• holding that “as is” clause in earnest money contract conclusively negated causation and reliance elements of plaintiffs fraud, negligence and DTPA claims
• holding that “as is” clause in earnest money contract conclusively negated causation and reliance elements of plaintiff’s fraud, negligence and DTPA claims
• holding that cash register receipts qualify as an \inscription\ under Rule 902(7)
• justifiable reliance is a necessary element of a claim for negligent misrepresentation
• justifiable reliance is a necessary element of a claim for negligent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).