Larry W. Moore and Naomi S. Moore v. United States Department of Agriculture on Behalf of Farmers Home Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the McDonnell Douglas test would apply to ECOA case but for the fact that plaintiffs had direct evidence of discrimination
• concluding that the TILA explicitly preserves sovereign immunity
• Close timing may be a significant factor, but not necessarily determinative of the relation between the protected activity and the adverse action.
• “Clearly, TILA indicates that Congress intended ‘government or governmental subdivision or agency’ to include the United States, because otherwise it would not have specifically preserved the United States’ immunity unless it believed that such immunity had been previously waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).