Larry W. Campbell and Jacquie L. Campbell v. Rolling Hills Reserve Property Owners Association, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating additionally that on collateral review it was \not entitled\ to question the holding of Williams in light of more recent developments in capital sentencing
• finding a right to cross examine the author of a psychiatric report under the Sixth Amendment during sentencing
• “Deficiencies attributable to errors and neglects of the petitioner's lawyer do not justify a second opportunity.”
• “state is entitled to treat as forfeited a proposition that was not presented in the right court, in the right way, and at the right time—as state rules define those courts, ways, and times”
• “A state is entitled to treat as forfeited a proposition that was not presented in the right court, in the right way, and at the right time—as state rules define those courts, ways, and times.”
• “A state is entitled to treat as forfeited a proposition that was not presented in the right court, in the right way, and at the right time – as state rules define those courts, ways, and times.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).