Larry R. Williams v. Union Carbide Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that as party admissions, pleadings in a prior case were admissible as substantive evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)
• “Pleadings in a prior case may be used as evidentiary admissions.”
• “It is the general rule that statements made by an attorney concerning a matter within his employment may be admissible against the party retaining the attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).