Larry R. Beedy, Jr. v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the ability to exclude all other individuals from an area is not necessary for a person’s expectation of privacy to be reasonable
• noting the court refused to consider testimony from the suppression hearing because it was outside of the warrant application
• finding legitimate expectation of privacy based on rental of room in a house, absence of family relationship between homeowner and tenant, and “exclusive possession and control” of room
• rejecting the “community-living exception” and holding under the state constitution that the homeowner’s tenant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his rented room even though it was not clearly marked with a lock or sign

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).