Larry R. Adkins and Sondra Adkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “other passages in the [Mendoza ] opinion arguably leave open the possibility that estoppel may apply against the government with respect to specific fact determinations, not embracing policy choices and legal issues”
• “other passages in the [Mendoza] opinion arguably leave open the possibility that estoppel may apply against the government wit h respect to specific fact determinations, not embracing policy choices and legal issues”
• “Bias cannot be inferred merely from adverse rulings . . . .” (citing McLaughlin v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 869 F.2d 1039, 1047 (7th Cir. 1989) and United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 (1966)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).