Larry Phillips v. Cathy Collings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s instructions to the jury because no prejudice resulted from the refusal to provide more detailed instructions
• affirming the district court's instructions to the jury because no prejudice resulted from the refusal to provide more detailed instructions
• \[W]e consider the cumulative effect of [the employer's] discriminatory actions rather than determining whether any individual action upon which the claim relies was sufficiently adverse.\
• \[W]e consider the cumulative effect of [the employer's] discriminatory actions rather than determining whether any individual action upon which the claim relies was sufficiently adverse.\
• “It is [w]hen the record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict, [that] judgment as a matter of law is appropriate.”
• “we need not determine for purposes of this appeal whether discrimination claims premised on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 require a showing of an adverse employment action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).