Larry Pearson, Jr. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the harmless error doctrine does not apply when the error consists in directing a verdict against a criminal defen- dant
• finding that the district court erred when it conclusively instructed the jury that the credit union in that case was a financial institution within the meaning of the federal bank robbery statute
• trial court conclusively instructed the jury that the robbed credit union was a federally insured credit union within the meaning of the relevant statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).