Larry Moran v. London Records, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts applying the 1909 Act held that assignees had standing to sue for copyright infringement
• “[I]t is significant that the example Congress [gave of a beneficial owner] was that of an author who assigned his work in exchange for royalties_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).