Larry Moore v. John Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the deficiency of allegations that related to “general responsibilities to oversee safety,” rather than “evidence of personal fault, as required to trigger individual liability under Louisiana law”
• affirming the district court’s decision to deny amendment to allow joinder of nondiverse parties because nothing in the parties’ briefing suggested that the plaintiff would be significantly injured, or that timing or other equitable considerations tipped in his favor
• “The district court should scrutinize an amended pleading naming a new nondiverse defendant in a removed case ‘more closely than an ordinary amendment.’”
• “The district court should scrutinize an amended pleading naming a new nondiverse defendant in a removed case ‘more closely than an ordinary amendment.’”
• “The district court should scrutinize an amended pleading naming a new nondiverse defendant in a removed case ‘more closely than an ordinary amendment.’”
• “Under Louisiana law, an employee is personally liable if (1) the employer owes a duty of care to a third person; (2) the employer delegated that duty to a defendant-employee; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).