Skip to main content
· 6/18/2015

Larry Lee v. Dean Willey

Citations

  • 789 F.3d 673
  • 2015 FED App. 0127P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10226
  • 2015 WL 3771051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “disputed issues of fact regarding exhaustion under the PLRA present[] a matter of judicial administration that [can] be decided in a bench trial”
  • holding that “disputed issues of fact regarding exhaustion under the PLRA present[] a matter of judicial administration that could be decided in a bench trial”
  • concluding that the prisoner failed to exhaust one of his two claims as he appealed only one through Level III of the TDOC’s grievance process
  • holding that “judges may resolve factual disputes relevant to the exhaustion issue without the participation of a jury”
  • holding that “disputed issues of fact regarding exhaustion under the PLRA present[ ] a matter of judicial administration that could be decided in a bench trial”
  • collecting cases and agreeing with the Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits that the court may resolve factual disputes relevant to the exhaustion issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Moore, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.