· 1/10/1996
Larry Grinder, Edward A. Loetel v. James A. Gammon Dora B. Schriro
Citations
- 73 F.3d 793
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 290
- 1996 WL 6766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error”
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error”
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error”
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error”
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error”
- noting that when no objections are filed “[the district court judge] would only have to review the findings of the magistrate judge for clear error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Magill, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.