Skip to main content
· 8/18/2003

Larry Donnell King v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden

Citations

  • 340 F.3d 821
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7425
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9309
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16801
  • 2003 WL 21956192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when a California petitioner files a subsequent petition, it does not constitute a new round of review if the petitioner is simply attempting to correct deficiencies in an earlier fil- ing
  • Swain and Duvall “allow amendment to comply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Fletcher, Per Curiam, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.