Skip to main content
· 7/30/2002

Larry D. Hysten v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

Citations

  • 296 F.3d 1177
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15639
  • 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,217
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 814
  • 2002 WL 1753185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a three-month gap between protected activity and adverse action was too long to establish causation by itself
  • noting that a three-month period between the protected conduct and termination is not sufficient to raise an inference of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Baldock, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.