Larry Bell v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s statement to detective was a statement by a party opponent and therefore not hearsay
• holding that it was not error to admit into evidence defendant’s out-of-court statement
• holding defendant’s statement to detective that he was good at “reading” people was a statement by a party opponent and therefore not hearsay
• recognizing Glover court’s adoption of definition
• relevant evidence damaging to the defendant’s theory is permittable and not unfairly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).