Larrowe Milling Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of testimony from late-disclosed witnesses was harmless
• presuming that “late-disclosed testimony will be admitted absent a willful violation, substantial prejudice to the nonviolating party, and the insufficiency of sanctions less drastic than 10 No. 57776-3-II exclusion”
• finding a Burnet violation where the trial court properly considered prejudice, but not willfulness or lesser sanctions prior to exclusion of late-disclosed witnesses
• finding a Burnet violation where the trial court properly considered prejudice, but not willfulness or lesser sanctions prior to exclusion of late-disclosed witnesses
• analyzing oral rulings by a trial judge to determine if substantive findings were made on the three Burnet factors, where severe sanction of witness exclusion was challenged
• holding Burnet error can be harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).