Larrick v. W&S Constr., L.L.C.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1338
Syllabus
More Definite Statement; 12(B)(6); 12(C); Motion to Dismiss; R.C. 4123.512; Civ.R. 8; Ward v. Kroger, 2005-Ohio-3560; Workers' Compensation. Plaintiff-Appellant did not object to the motion or order for more definite statement before the trial court; therefore, he waived his right to argue the more definite statement was wrongly ordered on appeal. The trial court did not err by granting Defendant-Appellee's motion to dismiss when Plaintiff-Appellant failed to specify a specific medical injury or condition in his pleadings.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court· 1991-06-12· cited 528×
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court· 1996-06-05· cited 418×
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court· 2011-09-07· cited 150×
- State v. Wintermeyer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-12-17· cited 80×
- Kalish v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-05-11· cited 73×
- Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-05· cited 41×
- Faber v. Seneca Cty. Sheriff's Dept.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-05· cited 11×
- Jones v. GilbertOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-13· cited 8×
- Price v. Aspen DentalOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-04· cited 2×
- Marshall v. Oncology/Hematology Care, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.