Larrabee v. Franklin Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of specifics regarding defendant’s prior criminal conduct reduced prejudicial effect of reference to his parole status
• holding mistrial not required because testimony did not identify any specific prior charge or conviction and therefore did not unambiguously convey defendant’s prior criminal conduct
• finding single reference to defendant’s parole status did not unambiguously convey defendant’s prior criminal conduct because it did not identify a specific crime
• objective to be served by RSA 651:6 pretrial notice requirement is to provide defendant with opportunity to refute findings required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).