Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 3/21/1997
Larochelle v. Hodsdon
Citations
- 1997 ME 53
- 690 A.2d 986
- 1997 Me. LEXIS 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court need not reach the issue of the continuous representation rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Rudman, Dana
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Mutual Insurance v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-04-04· cited 57×
- Kandlis v. HuotariSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-06-18· cited 36×
- Jim Mitchell and Jed Davis, PA v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-07-09· cited 21×
- Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-04-15· cited 20×
- Board of Overseers of the Bar v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-11-04· cited 17×
- Olson v. AlbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-04-02· cited 15×
- Employee Staffing of America, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-04-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.